Under which Austrian did Hayek actually study?
0
Under which Austrian did Hayek actually study?
Started by Murphy, Sep 04 2005 02:58 PM
7 replies to this topic
#3
-
- Administrators
-
- 1160 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 12 May 2006 - 09:38 PM
Right. A lot of people think Mises was Hayek's actual instructor but that's not really accurate.
#4
-
- Validating
-
- 126 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 21 November 2006 - 12:32 PM
Murphy, on Sep 4 2005, 02:58 PM, said:
Under which Austrian did Hayek actually study?
#5
-
- Administrators
-
- 1160 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 17 December 2006 - 03:57 PM
Joanne, on Nov 21 2006, 11:32 AM, said:
Friedrich von Weiser.
Yes. This is a major plank of Salerno's dehomogenization argument.
#6
-
- Guests
Posted 11 April 2007 - 08:36 PM
Murphy, on Sep 4 2005, 03:58 PM, said:
Under which Austrian did Hayek actually study?
Your reference to the "dehomogenization" argument threw me. I found it in the notes on p192 of the "15 great..." book. Was the argument that there really were two schools of Austrian thought - the "Misesians" and the "Hayekians", or that they were essentially the same and the language was simply different?
#7
-
- Administrators
-
- 1160 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 08 July 2007 - 02:02 PM
Doug K, on Apr 11 2007, 07:36 PM, said:
Friedrich von Wieser (who wasn't mentioned in Hayek's Nobel acceptance speech either)
Your reference to the "dehomogenization" argument threw me. I found it in the notes on p192 of the "15 great..." book. Was the argument that there really were two schools of Austrian thought - the "Misesians" and the "Hayekians", or that they were essentially the same and the language was simply different?
Your reference to the "dehomogenization" argument threw me. I found it in the notes on p192 of the "15 great..." book. Was the argument that there really were two schools of Austrian thought - the "Misesians" and the "Hayekians", or that they were essentially the same and the language was simply different?
Salerno thinks there are two separate branches of the Austrian School. I don't know if he'd call them 2 separate schools.
There's plenty of Salerno lectures on this at the LvMI media archives. If you look here, the two lectures on the decline and then the revival of the Austrian school probably get into it. Or you could just read Salerno's actual dehomogenization article.
#8
-
- Guests
Posted 07 July 2008 - 10:39 PM
Murphy, on May 12 2006, 09:38 PM, said:
Right. A lot of people think Mises was Hayek's actual instructor but that's not really accurate.
He only attended the private Seminars after he was awarded his doctorate in ECONOMICS.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
